How to prove that your car really is making that obnoxious noise

Our car has a feature called auto-hold. When turned on, you can bring the car to a stop, then take your foot off the brake and the car will keep the brake held for you until you press the accelerator. I really like this feature, but I’ve noticed that when I use it, I frequently hear a very high-pitch squeal from the driver’s side cabin. At first, I wasn’t sure if it was just my ears ringing, but I can reproduce it every time. Because the sound is so high-pitched, and because it’s relatively quiet, I wondered if there was a way that I could prove the sound was really there.

The game plan

  1. Record the sound with and without auto-hold (plus a baseline from a quiet room)
  2. Perform spectrum (Fast Fourier Transform) analysis on the audio to examine the amplitude at different frequencies
  3. Compare the spectrum plots from all three scenarios and look for anomalies


Recording was easy enough. The iPhone has a Voice Memos application that can capture recordings of arbitrary length. I wasn’t sure if the built-in microphone had the range required to capture the noise, but I’d find out soon enough. I took 3 recordings of both scenarios:

  • With auto-hold: Turn on auto-hold, bring the car to a stop, then record 10 seconds of audio
  • Without auto-hold: Turn off auto-hold, bring the car to a stop, then record 10 seconds of audio

Spectrum Analysis

With recordings in hand, it was time to have a look at a spectrum analysis. Spectrum analysis is something that blows your mind the first time you see it. The process uses some very fancy maths to break a signal (recording) apart in to a histogram of the various frequencies that make up the sound in the recording. The x-axis is frequency (pitch), and the y-axis is amplitude (volume). It’s important to note that amplitude is measured in decibels (dB). Decibels are not linear. They’re actually logarithmic. Keep that in mind when we get to the graphs.

The open source audio editing application, Audacity, has the ability to perform FFT spectrum analysis using a variety of algorithms. I transferred the audio from my iPhone to my Mac using iTunes, tediously dragged the files out of iTunes and renamed them (grrrrr), then imported them in to Audacity. I had to discard one of my auto-hold recordings because I forgot to turn the stereo off (it was quiet, but still there). Duh! Fortunately, I made three recordings.

With the audio imported in to Audacity, I selected the audio for a single track, then clicked Analyze, Plot Spectrum. I used Hamming window for my FFT analysis, which is a good general-purpose windowing algorithm. The result for an auto-hold recording looked like this:

Audacity Spectrum Plot

While the spectrum plots in Audacity looked amazing, it’s not possible to compare more than one at a time. Fortunately, there’s an export button that gives us a tab-separted text file with all the computed values. Looks like a great job for GNUPlot.

Comparison of Data

To compare the spectrum data, I exported the data to files: auto_hold.tsv, brake_hold.tsv, and ambient_room.tsv. I then used the following GNUPlot config to plot the graph:

# Let's output to a jpeg file
set terminal jpeg size 810,600
# set terminal x11 size 810,600
# This sets the aspect ratio of the graph relative ot the size
set size 1, 1
# The file we'll write to
set output "x3-autohold-spectrum-analysis.jpg"
# The graph title
set title "BMW X3 Audio Spectrum Analysis" font "Arial Bold,13"
# Where to place the legend/key
set key left top
# Draw gridlines both the x and the y axis
set grid y
set grid x
# Label the x-axis
set xlabel 'Frequency Hz'
# Use a small font so we can fit more labels on the x axis
set xtics rotate by 40 offset -1,-1.15 font "Arial,9" autofreq 1000,1000
# Only plot from 50 Hz to 15,400 Hz
set xrange [50:15400]
# Label the y-axis
set ylabel "Amplitude (dB)"
# Tell gnuplot to use tabs as the delimiter instead of spaces (default)
set datafile separator '\t'
# Plot the data
plot "./auto_hold.tsv" every ::2 using 1:2 title 'Auto-Hold' with lines, \
     "./brake_hold.tsv" every ::2 using 1:2 title 'Brake-Hold' with lines, \
     "./ambient_room.tsv" every ::2 using 1:2 title 'Quiet Room' with lines

The result:

X3 Autohold Spectrum Analysis

The quiet room plot gives us a good baseline for the noise profile of the recording equipment. Obviously, I don’t have a proper quiet room, but this should allow us to make relative judgements. The dB values on the y-axis are relative attenuation. That’s a fancy way of saying, “the sounds at this frequency were Y dB less than the maximum possible sound level”. We have to look at audio from an attenuation standpoint, because there is no absolute loudness when it comes to audio recording. You have a ceiling, from which you can relate to everything else.

The culprit sticks out like a sore thumb. When using auto-hold, there is a massive spike between 14 kHz and 15 kHz. Knowing that 20,000 Hz is about the upper boundary of human hearing, this looks like it should represent the sound I’m hearing. The actual peak values from the data files are:

Auto-hold: 14814.843750, -65.007362
Brake-hold: 14814.843750, -76.494194

That’s over 10 dB difference at the peak when auto-hold is on, versus when it’s off. Keep in mind that decibels are logarithmic, so the sound is over 10 times louder when using auto-hold! What’s interesting is that there is still some production of sound in that frequency during normal operation. They’re just not loud enough for me to hear. The car really is making an obnoxious sound when using auto-hold!

The only remaining question is whether the service department will take this as evidence of my claim, or whether they’ll just go all glassy-eyed on me and walk away. Either way, this was a lot of fun.

Why the giraffe riddle is stupid, wrong, and I’m that annoying guy who corrects people’s jokes

A good riddle leaves you with an “ah ha” feeling after you learn the answer. Like a bad movie with lots of plot holes, a bad riddle leaves us unfulfilled. There’s a “giraffe riddle” circulating Facebook right now that is, well, bad. The riddle:

“It’s 6:00 am, the doorbell rings and you wake up. You have unexpected visitors; it’s your parents, and they are there for breakfast. You have strawberry jam, honey, wine, bread and cheese. What is the first thing you open?” Remember, message me only! If you get it right I’ll post your name on my status, if you get it wrong you change your profile picture!

The purported answer is “your eyes”… Groan.

Ok, so what’s wrong with that answer? The problem is that the English language provides a means to express tense: past tense, present tense, and future tense.

Past: What is the first thing you opened?

Present: What are you opening?

Future: What is the first thing you [will] open? (the will is optional)

In the giraffe riddle, the first portion of the riddle sets the stage. We have the time, an event, and a description of your current circumstance. Then, we’re asked the question: What is the first thing you open?

So, according to the setup in the first portion of the riddle, we’re awake, the doorbell has rung, and we know it’s your parents who have arrived for breakfast. There is no mention that you have let them in, but it does mention you’re awake.

According to the responses I’ve received, the correct answer is “your eyes”, but that can’t be correct, because earlier in the riddle, it says we’re awake. The question “what is the first thing you open” implies future tense (or is at worst, ambiguous). Had the question been “what is the first thing you opened“, then your eyes would make sense as an answer.

The list of items is clearly intended to throw off the reader. It’s a clever setup, but the answer I’ve heard (your eyes) makes no sense unless the original author was a non-English speaker (some languages treat tense differently), or simply doesn’t understand grammar.

If you like the giraffe riddle (even if you don’t like the lousy answer), you might enjoy the riddle “A Giraffe, an Elephant, and a Refrigerator”:

The following short quiz consists of 4 questions and will tell you whether you are qualified to be a professional. The questions are NOT that difficult.

  1. How do you put a giraffe into a refrigerator?

Correct Answer: Open the refrigerator, put in the giraffe, and close the door. This question tests whether you tend to do simple things in an overly complicated way.

  1. How do you put an elephant into a refrigerator?

Did you say, Open the refrigerator, put in the elephant, and close the refrigerator?

Wrong Answer.

Correct Answer: Open the refrigerator, take out the giraffe, put in the elephant and close the door. This tests your ability to think through the repercussions of your previous actions.

  1. The Lion King is hosting an animal conference. All the animals attend…. except one. Which animal does not attend?

Correct Answer: The Elephant. The elephant is in the refrigerator. You just put him in there. This tests your memory.

Okay, even if you did not answer the first three questions correctly, you still have one more chance to show your true abilities.

  1. There is a river you must cross but it is used by crocodiles, and you do not have a boat. How do you manage it?

Correct Answer: You jump into the river and swim across. Have you not been listening? All the crocodiles are attending the Animal Meeting. This tests whether you learn quickly from your mistakes.

PS – I answered “the door”, and I’m not changing my profile picture :P

Apple’s greater vision of the post PC world

A friend of mine recently asked me how Apple expected to continue making any money while giving away software that Microsoft charges $200 for. Understanding how Apple can give away their software and still make money comes in understanding Apple’s business. Apple pundits frequently circle back to the point that Apple is a “hardware” company. As it turns out, they are wrong. Apple is a “devices” company. What is unique about Apple is their view that a device is made up of hardware & software, and that these two are inseparable. Apple believes this is the best view if you want to deliver a superior experience to the users of your products.

If you look at Apple as a hardware company — which I believe is a mistake — they make better margins than any of their competitors. Following that flawed line of thinking, what they’re doing now is using that extra profit to subsidize the software side. This viewpoint only holds if you view the hardware and software sides of the business as separate entities though.

Apple has combined the two. You’re not buying hardware or software, you’re buying a device. What good is a microwave without the software that connects the buttons to the timer, microwave generator, etc? That’s how Apple views their devices. By making Mavericks and iWork free, they’re expanding their notion of the “post PC world”. They’re not just talking about iOS devices, they’re talking about their entire line up.

If you’re wondering why Apple’s “PC” sales continue to grow while everyone else is sinking, I think you’ve found your answer.

Why you should never use “Identify with email”

I recently read an article advocating a method of authentication using email. My initial reaction was that the usability of such a solution would be very poor for a couple of reasons:

  • It’s bad UX to have users jumping between applications/locations to accomplish a linear task.
  • Email protocols don’t guarantee timely delivery; SMTP retry intervals are frequently specified in minutes, not seconds.

Besides the poor UX, there is a major security concern: email transport is unequivocally insecure.

With a shallow understanding of email, it appears that it might be secure, but that assumption would be wrong. The vast majority of email providers specify some form of encryption on the connection between client and server for both receiving (IMAP/POP) email, as well as sending (SMTP). However, this encryption is only used between you and your mail server because credentials are exchanged during these operations. Once the mail is handed off to your mail server, the email must be transported to the recipient mail server. This transfer to other servers is often unencrypted. As the auth provider, you could explicitly request encryption for SMTP relay to the destination server, but there is no guarantee that it will be accepted. What do you do when a user can’t receive secure email? Also, you have no way of knowing how the email will be relayed once you hand it off to the destination MX.

Authentication over HTTPS offers an explicit guarantee that A) the identity of the server is verified by a third-party, and B) the information being transported over the network cannot be read between here and there. Email cannot satisfy either of these important requirements, therefore you should avoid it as a primary means of authentication.

Apache Bench and Gnuplot: you’re probably doing it wrong

Update: After some reflection and good feedback on Hacker News, I should be clear that the graph output by the first method isn’t “wrong”, but rather (very) commonly misunderstood. I plan on doing a future blog post where I look at both graphs in more detail and try to find better ways to visualize the data.

I should know. I’m a domain expert in “doing it wrong”. I’ve also seen this done in more than one place, so I’m going to memorialize my incompetence with Gnuplot in this blog post.

Does this invocation look familiar? This is a simple example of an Apache Bench command that will run a benchmark against the specified server.

ab   -n 400 -c 10 -g apache-1.tsv  ""
^[1] ^[2]   ^[3]  ^[4]             ^[5]

I’ll break it down.

  1. ab: The Apache Bench benchmarking utility
  2. -n 400: The number of requests for your benchmark (yes, this one is crazy small; it’s so people don’t hammer by copy pasting)
  3. -c 10: Number of concurrent requests
  4. -g apache-1.tsv: This tells ab to write a “gnuplot-file” (that’s right from the man page)
  5. "": The URL you want to benchmark against

If you’ve used Apache Bench much, you’ve probably discovered the -g switch already. The man page tempts you with the suggestion that “This file can easily be imported into packages like Gnuplot”. The words “easily” and “Gnuplot” should not be spoken in the same sentence. This is not because Gnuplot is a bad tool; it is that Gnuplot is so insanely powerful that few people understand how to use it. Up until this afternoon, I was misusing it as well.

You’ve probably generated a graph from your Apache Bench Gnuplot file that looks something like this:

Sequence plot

This is the graph you get if you treat the gnuplot file provided by Apache Bench as a log file. This graph is probably not showing what you think it does. Hint: this is not response (ms) over chronologically ordered requests.

The problem is, the file output by Apache Bench is not a log file, it’s a data file. Log files are (generally) written serially, so we can treat the sequence of the lines synonymously with time sequence. Let me stop here for a second and make this clear…

The file output by the -g switch of Apache Bench is NOT in time sequence order. It is sorted by ttime (total time).

Yikes. Yes, I am embarrassed that it has taken me this long to realize that, but I’m not alone, so here we are.

The other problem is that the common invocations of gnuplot found scattered around the Internet mistreat this file. Below is a very common example, but even this includes some elements that common scripts miss. The key to spotting the error is in the plot line. The sequence-based graph (above) was created using a Gnuplot script that looks like this:

# Let's output to a jpeg file
set terminal jpeg size 500,500
# This sets the aspect ratio of the graph
set size 1, 1
# The file we'll write to
set output "graphs/sequence.jpg"
# The graph title
set title "Benchmark testing"
# Where to place the legend/key
set key left top
# Draw gridlines oriented on the y axis
set grid y
# Label the x-axis
set xlabel 'requests'
# Label the y-axis
set ylabel "response time (ms)"
# Tell gnuplot to use tabs as the delimiter instead of spaces (default)
set datafile separator '\t'
# Plot the data
plot "data/testing.tsv" every ::2 using 5 title 'response time' with lines

Let’s look at the plot line in more detail:

plot "data/testing.tsv" every ::2 using 5 title 'response time' with lines
^[1] ^[2]               ^[3]      ^[4]    ^[6]                  ^[7]

All of what I’m about to summarize is available in a much more detail in the gnuplot help pages, but here’s the tl;dr version:

  1. plot draws a data series on the graphing area
  2. This is the path to the input datafile
  3. Think of every as in “take every X rows”, only a lot more powerful; in our case, ::2 means start at the second row
  4. using allows you to specify which columns to use; we’ll use column 5, ttime (total time)
  5. An explicit title for the series we’re plotting
  6. Plot with lines

The problem is that we haven’t specified any x-axis ordering value. We’ve only specified that the values in column 5 should be used. Gnuplot will happily render our series for us.

The resulting graph has always puzzled me, and my bewilderment caused me to discard it and rely only on the data output by the Apache Bench report, rather than the graphs. If your graphs look anything like this, you’re looking at a request time distribution plot, with longer requests to the right, and shorter requests to the left. Hence the S-curve. It’s a fun graph, but it’s probably not telling you what you think it is.

Most people want to look at response (in ms) over time (seconds, serially). The good news is, everything we need is in the data file. Let’s look at a better Gnuplot script:

# Let's output to a jpeg file
set terminal jpeg size 500,500
# This sets the aspect ratio of the graph
set size 1, 1
# The file we'll write to
set output "graphs/timeseries.jpg"
# The graph title
set title "Benchmark testing"
# Where to place the legend/key
set key left top
# Draw gridlines oriented on the y axis
set grid y
# Specify that the x-series data is time data
set xdata time
# Specify the *input* format of the time data
set timefmt "%s"
# Specify the *output* format for the x-axis tick labels
set format x "%S"
# Label the x-axis
set xlabel 'seconds'
# Label the y-axis
set ylabel "response time (ms)"
# Tell gnuplot to use tabs as the delimiter instead of spaces (default)
set datafile separator '\t'
# Plot the data
plot "data/testing.tsv" every ::2 using 2:5 title 'response time' with points

We’ll look at the plot line in more detail:

plot "data/testing.tsv" every ::2 using 2:5 title 'response time' with points
^[1] ^[2]               ^[3]      ^[4]      ^[5]                  ^[6]

I’m going to repeat myself some here, but I want this to be clear, so here we go.

  1. plot draws a data series on the graphing area
  2. This is the path to the input datafile
  3. Think of every as in “take every X rows”, only a lot more powerful; in our case, ::2 means start at the second row
  4. using allows you to specify which columns to use; we’ll use columns 2 and 5, seconds (unix timestamp) and ttime (total time)
  5. An explicit title for the series we’re plotting
  6. Plot with points (lines won’t work, as we’ll see below)

The resulting graph looks like this:

Time series plot

Yeah, I know. Right now, you’re scratching your head trying to figure out just what the hell you’re looking at. This is not the pretty line graph we thought we were going to get.

Here’s the thing: unless you’re testing something unrealistically simplistic, your response times aren’t going to be well represented by a single line at any given time.

Keep in mind a few things:

  • We told Apache Bench to use concurrency 10
  • Apache Bench is going to go all out
  • The granularity of our time data is 1 second

The result is a graph that shows stacks of points. The graph above is difficult to read, because it’s rendered in such a small area. The version below is rendered at 1280 x 720. Give it a click to view the large version.


When you look at this graph, it becomes much clearer what’s going on. At each second of the test, there is a distribution of response times. The benchmark results I plotted are from one of the most complex JSON endpoints in our application. I also turned off caching so that the result would be computed each time. This made the data complex, but isn’t that what we’re after? If we can’t infer meaning from complex data, what good are our tools? Looking at this graph, I can see the distribution of response times, as well as the upper and low boundaries.

The scatterplot style graph is what I plan on using for now, but I think a candlestick chart or heatmap would probably be the best representation. I’m going to continue to work on the Gnuplot script until I have something really refined, so keep an eye out for updates!

Comments welcome on Hacker News

I’m like, totally CIA here

Sometimes you have one of those moments where you realize just how incredible the world is that we live in today. For example, The Bourne Supremacy was on television the other day, and I caught the scene where Jason Bourne was breaking in to the home of a former agent of the same clandestine program to question and then murder him… or not… or something. It’s a Bourne movie, what else would he be doing?

Anyway, the guy’s condo was awesome. I really like modern minimalist architecture, and this guy’s condo fit the bill. I had to know more. I managed to remember that his name was Jarda and Bourne was in Munich, so I fired up the Googles and went at it:

Google search for “bourne supremacy film locations“.

Click the very first result (ZOMG that was easy).

Hrm, not recognizing anything on page 1

Page 2BINGO!

And some clues…

By now it should come as no surprise that the ‘Munich’ house of Jarda, the other remaining Treadstone operative, is also Berlin, on Kaiserstrasse, in the Wannsee district.

Google “Kaiserstrasse Wannsee” because, why the hell not?

Ok, so that’s a map, and there’s satellite imagery. Cool, but how can I get a better view? I think Bing has aerial photography from little planes or something. Let’s try that.

And there are the condos.

Like, whoa.

Rubygems, HTTPS, and jRuby OpenSSL LoadError

UPDATE: It seems there was enough clamor over the unannounced change that a reversion to HTTP was warranted. The advice below isn’t needed currently, but may become relevant in the future, should HTTPS end up back in the mix without a suitable workaround.

Rubyists have been dropping by #rubygems this morning experiencing issues with jRuby and gem install. The issue is related to’s switch to forcing HTTPS on connections to their Gem repository. Specifically, there is a recursive issue with jruby-openssl when trying to install Gems from you need jruby-openssl to install jruby-openssl.

If you attempt to install a Gem in any version of jRuby prior to 1.7 that doesn’t already have jruby-openssl installed, you will receive a LoadError error that looks something like this:

Exception `LoadError' at /home/username/.rubies/jruby-1.5.1/lib/ruby/site_ruby/shared/jruby/openssl/autoloads/ssl.rb:8 - OpenSSL::SSL requires the jruby-openssl gem

The trouble is, you’ll get this message even if you’re trying to install the jruby-openssl gem. Uh oh.

The root of the problem is owed to two factors

  1. Prior to jRuby 1.7, OpenSSL support was not included in jRuby core because of crypto export constraints
  2. recently switched to forcing HTTPS as a means of increasing security in the rubygems ecosystem

The jRuby devs have worked through the crypto export issue, so updating to jRuby 1.7 will solve the problem; you no longer need jruby-openssl, period. If you’re stuck on an older version of jRuby and need to get gem install working again, you can use this horrible, hacky work around:

Download the jruby-openssl .gem file (using something like wget/curl) and install it from the local file like so:

gem install --local ./jruby-openssl-0.7.7.gem

Be sure to replace the version number with one compatible with your version of jRuby. Also, understand that there are no guarantees that the URL schema above will remain in place. Rubygems are an API, so the implementation may change. The long term solution is to move to jRuby 1.7.

He’s no Don Draper

Anyone who has seen Don Draper’s iconic Carousel speech knows that nostalgia is a terribly effective agent for emptying consumers’ pockets. Apparently, a reader at Daring Fireball saw a correlation between Don’s work and a recent advertisement for Internet Explorer.

Take a moment to watch both the Carousel speech and the Internet Explorer ad before you move ahead. I’ll wait.

I don’t doubt that the agency responsible for the advertisement had this in mind when they scripted this piece. Unfortunately, the ad falls flat for me.

I grew up in the 90s. I saw a lot of things I remember fondly when I watched the ad; if not with a chuckle at the absurdity of the 90s aesthetic. I did feel connected with the images, but why didn’t I feel connected to the product?

Don Draper tells us we should be nostalgic, but not because we have a strong sentimental attachment to film slides. We feel what we do because of what the Carousel delivers. We insert our slides, dim the lights, and we are taken back to “a place where we know we are loved”.


Unfortunately, yeterday’s Internet is gone. Internet Explorer cannot bring it back. Therefore, the product fails to deliver on the promise of the ad. That, I think, is the disconnect, and it’s the reason the ad falls flat for me.

Why be evil.rb?

Caius Durling shared some “hax” with the Ruby community that inspired some discussion over at Hacker News. I commented there, but it seemed like a decent topic for a blog post. One of the examples illustrates a means to define a method-local variable in the argument definition list:

  def output name=((default=true); "caius")
    "name: #{name.inspect} -- default: #{default.inspect}"

  output() # => "name: \"caius\" -- default: true"
  output("fred") # => "name: \"fred\" -- default: nil"

Have a closer look at the method definition line. This code works because of the way parenthesis are handled. Much like in math, when parenthesis are encountered, we evaluate from the inside out. Fire up an IRB session and run this code:

((default=true); "caius")

The return value given for the first line is “caius”, which gets assigned to “name” in our argument list, but you can also see that default is set to “true”. Using the semi-colon statement separator only works because we’ve wrapped the whole thing in parenthesis. That’s why the return value is “caius”. We leverage Ruby’s last-line return value feature.

This might all seem trivial to you if you’ve been programming in Ruby for a while, but therein lies the crux of the discussion. If we only ever wrote code for ourselves, this would be a non-argument. If we expect other people to read and use our code, we should write in a way that is easy to interpret.

Like many viewpoints, the “wrongness” of this example is not black & white; it’s shades of gray. On one hand, you have the “anything that will eval is valid Ruby” view, and on the other you have the “If it’s not immediately obvious to a beginner, you shouldn’t do it” view. There may be better ways to express those two sides of the matter, but that’s the general idea.

The problem with this code (from the latter viewpoint) is that it crams too much program logic in to the argument definitions. This example uses parenthesis to force the evaluation of default=true; "caius" in the argument definition list. That’s only two statements, but it violates some common expectations:

  1. We generally expect argument definitions to be clear and readable, so that method definitions are self documenting (to some degree); this approach clutters the argument definitions.

  2. We expect argument definitions to sometimes assign default values.

  3. We expect program logic to appear in the body of a method, or to be DRY’d up in separate methods.

In this way, the example is not “incorrect” but awkward. To borrow an idea from the literate programming camp, I’d say that just because you can write awkward sentences with valid grammar, it doesn’t mean you should.

Side note: In Caius’ defense, he does say never to use these.

You have no idea what Steve Jobs would do

The iOS 6 maps kerfuffle has the Steve Jobs prognosticators out in force, all crying the same old song: “Steve would have never let this happen!”

Really, folks? Really?

Very few people — less than I can count on one hand — ever demonstrated any ability to understand what was going on inside Steve Jobs head. The vast majority of the tech punditry flat out disagreed with him. Most common geeks foamed at the mouth in rage over some of Steve Jobs’ actual decisions. Remember the whole “no native apps” on the original iPhone? How about the time Steve Jobs went all Jules Winnfield on Adobe Flash?

The only person who demonstrated any ability to understand Steve Jobs’ reasoning on anything more than a superficial level was John Gruber, and the community over at Hacker News (a place full of really smart geeks) waits with baited breath to tear his articles apart.

The truth is, none of us have any clue whether Steve Jobs would have released iOS 6 Maps in this state. What we do know was that he was hoppin’ mad over Android, and put the wheels in motion on the Apple/Google separation long before his passing.

This whole thing really has nothing to do with anything. It’s just a plea. A plea to stop invoking the name of a man who’s time was cut short in an effort to add credibility to your argument. Yes, iOS Maps suck, but they suck regardless of what Steve Jobs might, or might not, have done.